Ah, America, the land of the free and the home of the brave—unless, of course, you’re brave enough to suggest universal healthcare, a minimum wage increase, or anything else that might edge the dial a little too far to the left. In that case, you’re clearly a card-carrying member of the Communist Party, plotting to take away everyone’s freedom, install breadlines, and turn the American Dream into the American Collective Nightmare.
But why do some Americans still hurl the term "communist" at Democrats and liberals like it’s the ultimate slur? Well, to get to the bottom of this, we must take a detour through history, irrational fears, and, of course, a healthy dose of good ol’ American paranoia.
The Ghost of McCarthyism
First, let’s tip our hats to Senator Joseph McCarthy, who, in the 1950s, decided that America was crawling with communists hiding under every bed, behind every curtain, and perhaps even in the produce section of your local grocery store. McCarthyism turned fear into a national pastime, convincing the average American that the next-door neighbor with the slightly longer beard was likely plotting to overthrow the government.
As historian Richard Hofstadter famously said, "America has been a fertile ground for paranoid politics, where the belief that a sinister conspiracy is at work behind the scenes has found a place in the national psyche." It’s as if McCarthy’s ghost still haunts the land, whispering in the ears of those who clutch their pearls at the mere mention of social programs.
The Lavender Scare
The 'Lavender Scare' was a reflection of the deep paranoia in the United States during the era of McCarthyism, where fear of Communism fueled suspicion and discrimination against anyone seen as different or nonconforming. Journalist Jack Nichols coined the term to describe the wave of firings and blacklisting of homosexuals within the U.S. government. In the early 1950s, this fear escalated when a Soviet spy ring in the United Kingdom, which included the openly gay Guy Burgess, was uncovered. This led to a widespread belief that gay men were vulnerable to Communist influence, making them targets in the broader crusade against perceived threats to American values. McCarthy's supporters zealously purged homosexuals from government positions, driven by the fear of those who deviated from the mainstream.
Today, we aren't so paranoid, but still, in the minds of some, if you are a little unconventional in any way, well, the chances are, you're a communist!
The Fear of Sharing
Americans, it seems, have a peculiar relationship with sharing. While kindergarten kids are taught that sharing is caring, something happens along the way—perhaps during that first high school economics class—that turns sharing into a dirty word.
Former President Ronald Reagan once quipped, "The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I’m from the government, and I’m here to help." For many, these words evoke images of government agents forcefully redistributing wealth, confiscating personal property, and making everyone wear the same gray jumpsuit.
But let’s be real: Democrats and liberals aren’t exactly proposing to nationalise all industries and abolish private property. Yet even suggesting that everyone should have access to affordable healthcare somehow triggers the fear that America will morph into the Soviet Union overnight.
It’s as if the idea of a communal effort to better society has become so alien that any hint of it is immediately branded as communism.
A Label for Everything
In America, labeling someone a communist is a bit like calling someone a witch in Salem—it’s vague enough to be terrifying but specific enough to make people back away slowly. It’s a label that requires no further explanation; the accusation alone is enough to taint someone’s reputation.
As political commentator H.L. Mencken once said, "The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." And what better hobgoblin than communism, which conjures images of gulags, secret police, and drab clothing? Never mind that the actual policies on the table are more about balancing inequality than leading a proletariat revolution.
The Irony of Government
But here’s the kicker: The very people who cry “communist” at the mere mention of a government-funded initiative are often the same ones who would scream the loudest if anyone suggested privatizing the military, the police, or the court system.
Let’s take a moment to appreciate the irony. Americans love their government-run institutions. They want a strong military, a dependable police force, fair courts, and beautiful national parks. They want their roads paved, their food inspected, and their air traffic controlled. But mention universal healthcare or subsidized education? That’s a step too far! That’s socialism! That’s communism!
Do we really want a privatized military, where the highest bidder controls the armed forces? How about police forces run by vigilantes, doling out justice as they see fit? Or courts that cave to the wealthiest, where money buys verdicts? And national parks? Imagine those sold off to wood-chipping firms, where pristine forests are chopped down faster than you can say "free market." Yet, somehow, when it comes to social safety nets, the tune changes entirely.
As much as some might deny it, government-run institutions are woven into the fabric of American life. They’re the backbone of a functioning society, ensuring that services essential to the public good are available to all, not just the wealthy few. Yet the idea that the government might extend these principles to healthcare, education, or welfare is still seen by some as the first step toward communism.
The Bogeyman Lives On
The truth is, the word "communist" has lost most of its original meaning but not its emotional punch. It’s a term that allows people to dismiss complex ideas with a single word, to ignore the nuances of policy, and to reduce debates to the level of a 1950s propaganda film.
Calling a liberal a communist is a convenient way to sidestep the actual issues, to refuse to engage with the ideas being presented, and to instead tap into a deep-seated fear that has been marinating in the American psyche for decades. It’s the political equivalent of covering your ears and shouting, "La la la, I can’t hear you!" when someone suggests a policy you disagree with.
The Outdated Fear
In the end, the fear of communism that lingers in American political discourse is as outdated as dial-up internet. The world has moved on, but in some corners of America, the specter of the Red Scare still looms large. It’s as if time stopped sometime in the 1950s, and any deviation from the status quo is viewed as a slippery slope to communism.
So the next time someone calls a Democrat or a liberal a communist, remember: it’s not about logic or facts. It’s about fear—an irrational, outdated fear that refuses to die. But maybe, just maybe, it’s time for America to finally let go of this bogeyman and start having real conversations about how to move forward, without the ghosts of the past looming over every debate.
After all, as Winston Churchill once remarked, "The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries." Perhaps, then, it’s time to find a middle ground that’s not haunted by the specter of communism but inspired by the possibility of a fairer, more just society. But let's not get ahead of ourselves—that sounds suspiciously like communism!
Comments